High CourtsSINGLE BENCH

Hansraj vs State of Punjab

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 18 August 2017 · Citation: (2017) 08 P&H CK 0010

HON’BLE JUDGES
Hari Pal Verma
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
<a href=3863>Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973</a>, <a href=3863-439>Section 439</a> - Special powers of High Court or Court of Session regarding bail · <a href=1767>Indian Penal Code, 1860</a>, <a href=1767-34>Section 34</a>, <a href=1767-306>Sec
RESULT
Disposed
CASE NUMBER
19534-2017
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

22 paragraphs · 216 words
1.

Prayer in this petition filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is for

grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case FIR No. 33 dated

13.10.2016 under Sections 306 / 34 IPC registered at Police Station GRP

Abohar, District Fazilka (Punjab).

2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner has argued that

petitioner is in custody since 18.10.2016. The trial in the case will take

long time. The allegation against the petitioner is that he allured the

father of the complainant who sold his 1.25 kila land to Bhola singh and

the had taken Rs. 13.70 lacs in the year 2010. He has not returned the

money and for this reason Sahdu Singh has committed suicide leaving

suicide note blaming the petitioner.

3.

Learned State counsel has filed the custody certificate and

does not dispute the custody and states that out of 26 prosecution

witnesses half the witnesses have been examined and trial will conclude

in the near future.

4.

I have heard learned counsel for the parties.

The petitioner is in custody since 18.10.2016 and the trial in

the case will take sufficient long time. The other co-accused has already

been granted bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is admitted on bail on

furnishing adequate bail bonds/surety bonds to the satisfaction of trial

Court.

5.

Petition stands disposed of.