High CourtsSingle Bench

Hardeep Singh alias Deepa vs State of Punjab

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 24 September 2018 · Citation: (2018) 09 P&H CK 0189

HON’BLE JUDGES
Rajbir Sehrawat, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 439 · Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substance Act, 1985 — Section 21, 22, 50
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous (M) No. 23585 Of 2018 (O&M)
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

15 paragraphs · 288 words

The present petition has been filed by the petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C for grant of bail pending trial in case FIR No.88 dated 22.06.2017

registered under Sections 21/22 of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substance Act, 1985 at Police Station Balachour, District Shaheed Bhagat Singh

Nagar.

Counsel for the petitioner contends that recovery from the petitioner is of non-commercial quantity. He relies upon a judgment of this Court in CRM-

M-35080 of 2018 â€" Rajvir Singh @ Raju v. State of

Punjab decided on 21.08.2018 to support his contention. It is further contended that in this case, the Investigating Officer and the complainant happens

to be the same person. Requirement of Section 50 of NDPS Act has not been complied with. The petitioner is in custody since 26.06.2017 and the

prosecution evidence has not even started. Therefore, it is submitted that the petitioner is not required for any investigation purposes.

On the other hand, counsel for the State, being instructed by ASI Nirmal Singh, does no t dispute the fact that the petitioner is in custody since

26.06.2017 and that no witness has been examined so far. However, it is pointed out that there are other cases against the petitioner, including the one

more case under NDPS Act.

In response to this, counsel for the petitioner submits that the application filed by petitioner for bail in case under NDPS Act is already pending. In the

cases under IPC, the petitioner has already been acquitted.

In view of the above submissions made by counsel for the petitioner, the present petition is allowed. It is ordered that the petitioner be released on bail

pending trial on his furnishing bail bonds/ sureties to the satisfaction of the trial Court/ Duty Magistrate.