AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
15 paragraphs · 288 wordsThe present petition has been filed by the petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C for grant of bail pending trial in case FIR No.88 dated 22.06.2017
registered under Sections 21/22 of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substance Act, 1985 at Police Station Balachour, District Shaheed Bhagat Singh
Nagar.
Counsel for the petitioner contends that recovery from the petitioner is of non-commercial quantity. He relies upon a judgment of this Court in CRM-
M-35080 of 2018 â€" Rajvir Singh @ Raju v. State of
Punjab decided on 21.08.2018 to support his contention. It is further contended that in this case, the Investigating Officer and the complainant happens
to be the same person. Requirement of Section 50 of NDPS Act has not been complied with. The petitioner is in custody since 26.06.2017 and the
prosecution evidence has not even started. Therefore, it is submitted that the petitioner is not required for any investigation purposes.
On the other hand, counsel for the State, being instructed by ASI Nirmal Singh, does no t dispute the fact that the petitioner is in custody since
26.06.2017 and that no witness has been examined so far. However, it is pointed out that there are other cases against the petitioner, including the one
more case under NDPS Act.
In response to this, counsel for the petitioner submits that the application filed by petitioner for bail in case under NDPS Act is already pending. In the
cases under IPC, the petitioner has already been acquitted.
In view of the above submissions made by counsel for the petitioner, the present petition is allowed. It is ordered that the petitioner be released on bail
pending trial on his furnishing bail bonds/ sureties to the satisfaction of the trial Court/ Duty Magistrate.
