AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
17 paragraphs · 306 wordsPrayer in this petition is for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case FIR No. 216 dated 11.08.2018, registered under Section 22-C of the NDPS
Act, 1985 at Police Station Dabwali, District Sirsa.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in judicial custody since 11.08.2018 and his bail application was dismissed by the
Additional Sessions Judge, Sirsa, vide order dated 20.09.2018 (Annexure P-2).
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the report of the FSL is still awaited. Learned counsel for the petitioner has relied upon Inderjeet Singh
@ Laddi and others vs State of Punjab, 2014 (3) RCR (Criminal) 953, to contend that till the report of the FSL is received, the petitioner may be
released on interim bail. Learned counsel for the petitioner has further submitted that the petitioner is not involved in any other case and till date, the
report of the FSL/Chemical Examiner has not been received.
Learned State counsel has not disputed the factual position but opposed the prayer for bail.
In view of the judgment of this Court in Inderjeet Singh @ Laddi’s case (supra), wherein it has been held that awaiting the report of Chemical
Examiner/FSL, the accused-petitioner can be granted interim bail till the receiving of such report.
Accordingly, this petition is allowed and the petitioner is directed to be released on interim bail subject to his furnishing bail/surety bonds to the
satisfaction of the trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate/Duty Magistrate, till receiving of the FSL report.
The petitioner shall submit an undertaking before the trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate/Duty Magistrate along with his bail/surety bonds that he will
surrender before the trial Court on receiving the FSL report.
However, it will be open for the prosecution to apply for cancellation of bail, if the petitioner is found involved misusing the concession of bail, in any
manner.
