High CourtsSingle Bench

Hari Kishan Dhoot & Anr vs Satish Kumar Aggarwal & Anr

Delhi High Court · Decided on 27 September 2019 · Citation: (2019) 09 DEL CK 0380

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sanjeev Sachdeva, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 — Section 14(1)(e)
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
RC.Revision No. 364 Of 2018, Civil Miscellaneous Application No. 30537 Of 2018
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

9 paragraphs · 171 words

Sanjeev Sachdeva, J

1.

Petitioner impugns order dated 24.04.2018, whereby, leave to defend application of the petitioner has been dismissed and an eviction order passed.

2.

Respondent had filed the subject eviction petition seeking eviction of the petitioner, on the ground of bonafide necessity under Section 14(1) (e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958, from Property No.213, First Floor, Gali Batasan, Chawri Bazar, Delhi-110006, Delhi, more particularly as shown in red colour in the site plan annexed with the eviction petition.

3.

Parties were referred to mediation.

4.

Learned counsels for the parties inform that the mediation was successful and consequent to the settlement, the petitioner has handed over peaceful vacant possession of the tenanted premises to the respondent.

5.

Learned counsel for the parties inform that all disputes between the parties stand settled and now nothing is surviving against each other.

6.

Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the petition.

7.

The Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

8.

Order Dasti under signatures of the Court Master.