High CourtsDivision Bench

Hari Shankar Gupta vs State Of Chhattisgarh And Ors

Chhattisgarh High Court · Decided on 17 October 2019 · Citation: (2019) 10 CHH CK 0126

HON’BLE JUDGES
P.R. Ramachandra Menon, CJ · Parth Prateem Sahu, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Writ Appeal No. 480 Of 2019
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

15 paragraphs · 298 words

P. R. Ramachandra Menon, CJ

1.

Challenge is against the judgment passed by the learned Single Judge declining to interfere with the transfer order Annexure P/1 dated 12.07.2019,

whereby the service of the Petitioner has been transferred from the Government Middle School, Sontarai, Block Udaipur, District Surguja (C.G.) to

the Government Middle School, Kot, Block Mainpat, District Surguja (C.G.).

2.

The learned counsel for the Appellant submits that the merit of the case has not been considered and the transfer order has been passed in violation

of the dead line. It is pointed out that the Appellant is likely to suffer in view of the fact that he has been transferred to a place where already one

teacher in surplus is working, which may adversely effect the right of the Appellant to draw the salary as well.

3.

On going through the verdict under challenge, it is seen that the matter was disposed off based on the submission made on the part of writ

Petitioner, that Petitioner would be satisfied, if liberty was given to prefer a representation before the Respondents raising all the relevant grounds and

to have it decided as expeditiously as possible. It was accordingly, that the matter was disposed off with liberty to the Petitioner to prefer detailed

representation before the Respondents with regard to the transfer, simultaneously directing the Respondents to have it finalized as expeditiously as

possible, it being a case of transfer. Form the above, it is quite evident that it is an agreed order and as such, the Appellant is not justified in taking 'u-

turn' to have it challenged by filing an appeal.

4.

We do not find any merit. Interference is declined. Appeal is dismissed without prejudice to the rights as already granted by the learned Single

Judge.