High CourtsSingle Bench

Harinder Kaur and Others vs Darbara Singh and Others

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 11 February 2011 · Citation: (2011) 02 P&H CK 0143

HON’BLE JUDGES
K. Kannan, J
CASE NUMBER
FAO No. 361 of 1992
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

54 paragraphs · 362 words

K. Kannan, J.

1 There is no representation for the Appellant. Counsel for the Respondent-insurance company is present and I proceed to take up the case and dispose it of on merits on the basis of records and with the assistance of the counsel for the Respondent-insurance company and particularly, having regard to the fact that the scales of compensation and methods of arriving at compensation for death are fairly settled by the decision of Hon''ble Supreme Court in Smt. Sarla Verma and Others Vs. Delhi Transport Corporation and Another, .

2 The deceased was an income tax Assessee and it is not very clear from the order as to the nature of business that the deceased was having. He had been assessed to income tax at Rs. 88998/-for the year 1991 and he was paid tax of Rs. 25380/-. The net income was Rs. 63,618/-and the Tribunal was right in observing that his income could never have been only anything less than returned as income by the Income Tax Department. will, therefore, take the income as established, but instead of 1/3rd deduction, I will take 1/4th deduction and apply a multiplier of 16. The assessment of compensation is tabulated here below:

Fatal Accidents

Age:

35

Occupation

88,998 -

25380

Claimants

Wife, 2 minor children & Mother

Heads of Claim

Tribunal

High Court

Sr.No.

Amount Rs.

Amount Rs.

1.

Annual Income

63,618

63,618

2.

Add % of increase 30%/50%

3.

Deduction (1/2,1/3, 1/4, 1/5)

1/3

1/4

4.

Multiplicand - Tax

42,412

47,713.50

5.

Multiplier

16

16

6.

Loss of Dependence

7,63,416

7.

Medical Expenses

-

8.

Loss of Consortium + loss of love and affection

10,000

9.

Loss to Estate

5000

10.

Funeral Expenses

2500

Total 6,78,600/

7,80,916/

3.

The amount of increase over what has been determined by the Tribunal will also attract interest @ 6% from the date of petition till the date of payment. The enhanced portion of the compensation amount will be distributed amongst the widow and the children only. The liability shall be in the same manner as determined by the Tribunal.

4.

Registry is directed to send a copy of this order to the party directly.