High CourtsSingle Bench

Haris vs State Of Kerala

High Court Of Kerala · Decided on 11 February 2022 · Citation: (2022) 02 KL CK 0111

HON’BLE JUDGES
Gopinath P, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 279, 304, 338 · Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 — Section 185
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Bail Application No. 561 Of 2022
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

26 paragraphs · 518 words

Gopinath P., J

1.

This is an application for regular bail.

2.

The petitioner is the accused in Crime No.9/2022 of Pantheerankavu Police Station, Kozhikode District alleging commission of offences under

Sections279, 338 and 304 of the Indian Penal Code and under Section 185 of the Motor Vehicles Act.

3.

The allegation against the petitioner is that on 6.1.2022 at about 5 p.m., the petitioner was driving lorry in a rash and negligent manner as a result of

which he rammed into three cars and a goods autorickshaw and two persons died and four others sustained grievous injuries. It is alleged that the

petitioner was in a highly intoxicated stage when the offence was committed.

4.

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is absolutely innocent in the matter. It is submitted that the accident occurred only

on account of mechanical failure and not on account of any negligence on the part of the petitioner. It is submitted that the continued detention of the

petitioner is not required for the purposes of investigation.

5.

The learned Public Prosecutor points out the circumstances appearing against the petitioner. It is pointed out that due to the rash and negligent

driving by the petitioner, he rammed into four vehicles and two persons travelling in a Car lost their lives and four others sustained very serious

injuries. It is submitted that such rash and negligent driving under the influence of alcohol is increasing day by day and such incidents have to be dealt

with very seriously. It is submitted that the petitioner is not entitled to be released on bail.

5.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the nature of the allegations against the petitioner and also considering

the fact that he has been in custody from 6.1.2022, I am of the opinion that the petitioner can be released on bail, subject to conditions.

6.

In the result this bail application is allowed. It is directed that the petitioner shall be released on bail, subject to the following conditions:-

(i) The petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees fifty thousand only) with two solvent sureties each for the like sum to the satisfaction of the

jurisdictional Court;

(ii) The Petitioner shall report before the Investigating officer in Crime No.9/2022 of Pantheerankavu Police Station as and when called upon to do so;

(iii) The driving licence of the petitioner, if not already suspended, shall remain suspended for a period of six months from today. This will be in addition to and not in

derogation of any proceedings initiated against the petitioner under the provisions of the Motor Vehicles Act and Rules framed thereunder;

(iv) The petitioner shall not attempt to interfere with the investigation, influence or intimidate any witness in Crime No.9/2022 of Pantheerankavu Police Station;

 (v) The petitioner shall not involve in any other crime while on bail.

If any of the aforesaid conditions are violated, the Investigating officer in Crime No.9/2022 of Pantheerankavu Police Station may file an application

before the jurisdictional Court for cancellation of bail.