High CourtsSingle Bench

Harish Chand & Others vs State Of Uttarakhand & Others

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 20 July 2021 · Citation: (2021) 07 UK CK 0127

HON’BLE JUDGES
Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition (M/S) No. 1363, 1372, 1373 Of 2021
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

19 paragraphs · 355 words

Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J

1.

Heard learned counsel for the parties through video conferencing.

2.

Since common question of law and facts are involved in these writ petitions, therefore are being taken up together and are being adjudicated by this

common judgment. However, for the sake of brevity, facts of Writ Petition (M/S) No. 1363 of 2021 are being considered.

3.

Petitioner was granted license for retail sale of Indian Made Foreign Liquor for the financial year 2020-2021. According to the petitioner, his sale

was badly affected due to lockdown imposed in view of COVID-19 Pandemic, therefore, he could not deposit the amount of Minimum Monthly

Guarantee duty. The District Excise Officer, Almora has issued an order on 29.05.2021, whereby Collector, Almora has been requested to recover a

sum of Rs. 27,55,868+ recovery charges, total amounting to Rs. 30,31,455/- from the petitioner. Thus, feeling aggrieved, petitioner has approached this

Court.

4.

Learned counsel for the petitioner has referred to an order dated 08.06.2021 passed by a Coordinate Bench of this Court in WPMS No. 1040 of

2021 and other connected petitions. Based on the said order, learned counsel submits that under the Excise Policy, a Committee has been constituted

headed by Chief Secretary, Govt. of Uttarakhand to deal with the matters, which are not provided in the Excise Rules and Policy. He, thus, submits

that present writ petitions may be disposed of in terms of the aforesaid order dated 08.06.2021.

5.

Mr. G.S. Negi, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel appearing for the State also does not dispute that the facts of the present case are similar

to one involved in WPMS No. 1040 of 2021.

6.

Having regard to the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the writ petitions are disposed of in terms of order dated 08.06.2021 passed in WPMS No.

1040 of 2021. Petitioner(s) shall be at liberty to approach the Committee constituted under Clause 35 of the Policy, within two weeks from today. If

petitioner(s) approach the Committee by making representation(s) within the stipulated time, then Committee shall look into their grievances and take

appropriate decision, in accordance with law, within two months thereafter.