High CourtsDivision Bench(2011) 08 AHC CK 0231

Harish Chandra vs State of U.P. and Others

Allahabad High Court · Decided on 3 August 2011 · Citation: (2011) 7 ADJ 162

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sunil Hali, J · R.K. Agrawal, J
CASE NUMBER
Civil Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 42820 of 2011

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

4 paragraphs · 167 words
1.

The sole contention raised by the learned Counsel for the Petitioner is that even though he had filed his objections before the Tehsildar yet without deciding the same Teshildar has proceeded to recover the amount by way of auction sale. Reliance upon a decision of Apex Court in the case of Seth Banarsi Dass (Dead) by LRs Vs. District Magistrate and Collector, Meerut and others,

2.

Heard learned Counsel for the parties.

3.

In is not dispute that the Petitioner has made objection before the Tehsildar against the proposed recovery and without deciding the same recovery is being pressed against him. In view of the law laid down in the case of Seth Banasari Dass (dead) by LRs. (supra) we disposed of this petition with the direction of the Tehsildar to first decide the objection of the Petitioner within a period of six weeks from today and thereafter proceed with the recovery of the amount in accordance with law.

4.

The writ petition stands disposed of.