High CourtsSingle Bench

Harish Kumar & Ors vs State (N.C.T Of Delhi) & Anr

Delhi High Court · Decided on 1 October 2018 · Citation: (2018) 10 DEL CK 0056

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sanjeev Sachdeva, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 34, 406, 498A
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous CaseNo.4469 OF 2018
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

24 paragraphs · 462 words

SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J. (ORAL)

1.

The petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.521/2008 under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC, Police Station Sangam Vihar, based on a settlement. Â

2.

Learned counsel for the petitioners prays for an exemption for personal appearance of petitioner Nos.3 and 5, who are the husband of the sister and

sister of the petitioner No.1 respectively, on the ground that they are permanent resident of Kanpur and because of their personal work could not be

present in Court. They have filed their affidavits in support of the petition.Â

3.

In view of the above, the petitioner Nos.3 and 5 are granted exemption from personal appearance.Â

4.

The subject FIR emanates out of matrimonial discord. Petitioner No.1 is the husband of respondent No.2. Petitioner Nos.2 and 4 are the father-

in-law and mother-in-law of the respondent No.2. Petitioner No.3 is the husband of the sister-in-law of the respondent No.2. Petitioner No.5 is the

sister-in-law of the respondent No.2.

5.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the parties have settled their disputes through the process of mediation held at Mediation Centre,

Saket on 15.04.2017. The parties have already been divorced by way of a decree of divorce by mutual consent, passed on 10.04.2018.

6.

The respondent No.2 was to be paid a total sum of Rs.10,00,000/- in full and final settlement of all her claims. The sum of Rs.9,00,000/- has already

been paid. The balance of sum of Rs.1,00,000/- has been paid by way of a Demand Draft bearing No.185980 dated 19.07.2018 drawn on State Bank

of India.Â

7.

Respondent No.2 is present in person, represented by counsel and is identified by the Investigating Officer. She submits that she has settled her

disputes with the petitioners and does not wish to press charges against the petitioners and prosecute the complaint any further.Â

8.

In view of the fact that the proceedings emanate out of a matrimonial discord and the parties have fully and finally settled their disputes and the

respondent No.2 has stated that she does not wish to press the complaint any further and the fact that the parties have already been divorced by way

of a decree of divorce by mutual consent, passed on 10.04.2018, continuation of criminal proceedings will be an exercise in futility and justice in the

case demands that the dispute between the parties is put to an end and peace is restored; securing the ends of justice being the ultimate guiding factor.

It would be expedient to quash the subject FIR and the consequent proceedings emanating therefrom.

9.

In view of the above, the petition is allowed. FIR No.521/2008 under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC, Police Station Sangam Vihar and the

consequent proceedings emanating there from are quashed.Â

10.

Order Dasti under the signatures of the Court Master.