High Courts

Hariya @ Harish Chandra (In Jail) vs State of U.P.

Allahabad High Court · Decided on 20 March 2008 · Citation: (2008) 03 AHC CK 0114

HON’BLE JUDGES
Barkat Ali Zaidi, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) — Section 439
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2958 of 2008
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 139 words

Barkat Ali Zaidi, J.—Heard Sri Yashwant Singh, Advocate for the applicant and Sri Arvind Tripathi, Additional Government Advocate for the State.

2.

The trial Court rejected the bail that there are two witnesses, who saw the accused in the course of occurrence and he is named in the F.I.R. It seems a little improbable that the accused known to so many persons, came with open face, with dacoits for looting his covillagers.

3.

We, therefore, feel inclined to grant bail.

4.

The appellant be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 15,000/ with one surety in the like amount to thesatisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Moradabad.

5.

However, any observation in the bail order should not hinder the trial Court in arriving at its own conclusions, on basis of the evidence, adduced in the case.