High CourtsSingle Bench

Harjeet Kaur vs Daljeet Singh

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 1 May 2015 · Citation: (2015) 4 RCR(Civil) 84

HON’BLE JUDGES
Naresh Kumar Sanghi, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC) — Section 24 · Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) — Section 125 · Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 — Section 13, 21-A, 9
RESULT
Disposed off
CASE NUMBER
Transfer Application No. 238 of 2014 (O&M)
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

7 paragraphs · 527 words

Naresh Kumar Sanghi, J—The present petition has been filed under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure for transfer of petition tilted as "Daljeet Singh v. Harjeet Kaur" filed under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act, pending adjudication before learned Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division) Guhla, to the Court of competent jurisdiction at Ambala. Learned counsel for the petitioner/wife contends that the petitioner/wife has to maintain two minor children and there is no adult member in her family to accompany her from Ambala to Guhla for defending her case. He further contends that a petition under Section 125, Cr.P.C., and a case arising out of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, filed by the petitioner/wife are pending adjudication before the courts at Ambala and as such, it would be appropriate that all the cases pending between the same parties are tried by the courts at one station.

2.

In spite of service, no one has proposed to appear on behalf of the respondent.

3.

I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and with his able assistance gone through the material available on record.

4.

In Sumita Singh Vs. Kumar Sanjay and Another, AIR 2002 SC 396 : (2001) 10 SCC 41 : (2001) AIRSCW 5193 : (2001) 5 Supreme 667 Hon''ble the Supreme Court while dealing with the petition under Section 24, CPC, for transfer of a matrimonial case held that "it is the wife''s convenience that must be looked at". In Jitender Kaur v. Manpreet Singh, Transfer Application No. 263 of 2009, decided on 25.11.2009, by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court held that in terms of Section 21-A of the Hindu Marriage Act, all proceedings under the Hindu Marriage Act have to be tried by the same Court, therefore, a petition under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act filed by the respondent has to be tried by the same court which is seized of earlier proceedings under Section 9 of the Act.

5.

Similar were the pronouncements by this Court in the matters of Annu Arora v. Rakesh Kumar, Transfer Application No. 648 of 2011, decided on 16.12.2011 and Bupinder Kaur v. Inderpreet Singh, Transfer Application No. 616 of 2011, decided on 09.05.2012 by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court. In the matter of "Leena Kalra @ Lovely v. Parveen Kumar", Transfer application No. 381 of 2014, decided by this Court on 30.03.2015, the same view was endorsed.

6.

Keeping in view the factual and legal aspects of the case, the petition titled as "Daljeet Singh v. Harjeet Kaur" pending before the learned Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Guhla, is transferred to the Board of learned District Judge, Ambala, who shall either try the said case himself/herself or assign to any other court of competent jurisdiction to try the said case in accordance with law. Learned Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division) Guhla, shall send the complete record of the above said case to the Court of learned District Judge, Ambala, as soon as the copy of this order is received. Disposed of accordingly.

The parties to the lis shall appear before learned District Judge, Ambala, on 29.05.2015.