High CourtsSingle Bench

Harman And Another vs State Of Punjab And Others

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 10 October 2024 · Citation: (2024) 10 P&H CK 1202

HON’BLE JUDGES
Vinod S. Bhardwaj, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
CRWP Of 9868 Of 2024

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

10 paragraphs · 380 words

Vinod S. Bhardwaj, J

The petitioners namely Harman and Gurpreet Singh have approached this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for seeking protection of their lives and personal liberty from private respondents No.4 to 6.

The contention of the petitioners is that both are major, aged 20 years and 27 years respectively. In support thereof, copy of the Aadhaar Cards pertaining to the petitioners have been appended. The petitioners further contend that they have performed marriage against the wishes of their parents. The marriage of the petitioners was solemnized on 08.10.2024 at Prachin Pashupati Nath Shiv Mandir Society, Mansa Devi Market, Sector-4, Panchkula as per Hindu rites and ceremonies. A copy of marriage certificate (Annexure P-3) issued by the aforesaid Mandir has also been appended. The petitioners apprehend threat to their lives and claim that there is a constant danger of being implicated in a false case.

Notice of motion restricted to respondents No.1 to 3 only. Pursuant to supply of advance copy, Mr. Ajaib Singh, Addl. A.G. Punjab appears and accepts notice on behalf of respondents No.1 to 3.

Learned counsel for the petitioners states that a representation dated 08.10.2024 (Annexure P-5) has also been submitted by the petitioners to the Superintendent of Police, Sangrur.

Learned State counsel has no objection if appropriate direction for providing requisite protection to the petitioners is given.

Without examining the question of legality and validity of the marriage and expressing any opinion thereon, the petition is disposed of with the directions to respondent No.3- Station House Officer, P.S. Sunam, District Sangrur to look into the grievances of the petitioners as set out in the petition and also expressed in the representation (Annexure P-5) and take appropriate action for protection of their lives and liberty as may be warranted by the circumstances.

However, it is clarified that in case any criminal case has been/is registered against the petitioners, nothing in this order shall be construed as a bar for taking appropriate action by the police authorities in respect thereof in accordance with law.

The Registry is directed to send a copy of this order along with copy of the petition and above-said representation to respondent No.3- Station House Officer, P.S. Sunam, District Sangrur for requisite compliance.

The petition is disposed of.