High CourtsSingle Bench

Harmesh Lal vs State Of Punjab

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 16 February 2021 · Citation: (2021) 02 P&H CK 0169

HON’BLE JUDGES
Harnaresh Singh Gill, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 406, 420 · Punjab Travel Professional's (Regulation) Act, 2014 — Section 13 · Emigration Act, 1983 — Section 24 · Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 438(2)
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous Petition (M) No. 36428 Of 2020
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

27 paragraphs · 426 words

Harnaresh Singh Gill, J

Case is taken up for hearing through video conferencing.

Through this petition, the petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in case bearing FIR No.83 dated 23.10.2020, registered at Police Station Sadar

Nawanshahr, District SBS Nagar, under Sections 406,420 IPC, Section 13 of the Punjab Travel Professional's (Regulation) Act, 2014 and Section 24

of the Emigration Act, 1983.

On 06.11.2020, this Court passed the following order:-

“Case is taken up for hearing through video conferencing.

Through this petition, the petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in case bearing FIR No.83 dated 23.10.2020, registered at Police Station Sadar

Nawanshahr, District SBS Nagar, under Sections 406,420 IPC, Section 13 of the Punjab Travel Professional's (Regulation) Act, 2014 and Section 24

of the Emigration Act, 1983.

Learned counsel for the petitioner states that out of the total amount of Rs.4,50,000/- paid by the complainant to the petitioner, the petitioner has

already returned an amount of Rs.2,40,000/- to him. It is further submitted that the remaining amount of Rs.,2,10,000/-, shall be returned by the

petitioner in four equal installments within a period of two months.

Notice of motion for 29.01.2021.

Meanwhile, the petitioner is directed to join the investigation and if he is sought to be arrested, he shall be released on interim bail to the satisfaction of

Investigating Officer/Arresting Officer subject to the conditions as envisaged in Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

In the meantime, as per the undertaking given by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner shall pay the amount of Rs.2,10,000/- in four

equal installments within a period of two months.â€​

On 29.01.2021, since the petitioner did not pay an amount of Rs.2,10,000/- to the complainant, learned counsel for the petitioner undertook that the

petitioner would deposit the aforesaid amount by Monday i.e. 01.02.2021 with the Investigating Officer.

Learned counsel for the complainant states that now the petitioner has paid an amount of Rs.2,10,000/- to the complainant by way of demand draft

dated 02.02.2021.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that pursuant to the order dated 06.11.2020 passed by this Court, the petitioner has joined the investigation.

Learned State counsel, on instructions from ASI Raj Kumar, submits that the petitioner has joined the investigation and is not required for any further

investigation.

In view of the above, without commenting on the merits of the case, the present petition is allowed and the order dated 06.11.2020 passed by this

Court granting interim bail to the petitioner, is made absolute, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.