AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
16 paragraphs · 345 wordsSandeep Sharma, J
By way of present contempt petition, prayer has been made on behalf of the petitioner for initiation of contempt proceedings against the
respondents for having willfully and intentionally disobeyed the directions contained in judgment dated 17.10.2019, passed by the Division Bench of this
Court in CWP No. 2915 of 2019, whereby the Division Bench of this Court having taken note of the statement made by the learned counsel for the
petitioner that his case is squarely covered by the judgment dated 17.7.2014, passed by this Court in CWP No. 3050 of 2014, titled Nek Ram v. State
of HP and Ors., disposed of the petition with direction to the respondents/competent authority to consider the case of the petitioner in light of aforesaid
judgment and thereafter, grant similar benefit to him in case he is found to be similarly situate within a period of three months from the date of
production of copy of the order/judgment. Since no action, whatsoever, came to be taken at the behest of the respondents pursuant to aforesaid
direction issued by the Division Bench of this Court, petitioner has approached this Court in the instant proceedings.
Mr. Shyam Singh Chauhan, Advocate, while accepting the notice on behalf of the respondents, submits that though he has every reason to presume
that by now, judgment alleged to have been violated must have been complied with in its totality, but if not, same would be positively complied with
within a period of six weeks from today.
Consequently, in view of the fair stand adopted by the learned counsel for the respondents, this Court sees no reason to keep the present petition
alive and accordingly, same is closed. However, respondents-contemnors are directed to do the needful in terms of judgment alleged to have been
violated within a period of six weeks, failing which they would aggravate the contempt and petitioner would be at liberty to get the present petition
revived so that appropriate action in accordance with law is taken. Notices issued to respondents are discharged at this stage.
