High CourtsDivision Bench

Harnam Singh vs H.R.T.C. and Another

High Court Of Himachal Pradesh · Decided on 29 June 2011 · Citation: (2011) 06 SHI CK 0227

HON’BLE JUDGES
Kurian Joseph, C.J · V.K. Sharma, J
CASE NUMBER
CWP No. 4955 of 2011

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

2 paragraphs · 131 words

Kurian Joseph, C.J.—The Petitioner is aggrieved since according to him, the entire eligible pensionary benefits have not been granted to him. He has submitted Annexure P-4, legal notice before the second Respondent. There will be a direction to the second Respondent to look into the matter and take appropriate action thereon in accordance with law, after affording an opportunity of hearing to the Petitioner. This shall be done within a period of two months from the date of production of copy of this judgment along with copy of the writ petition by the Petitioner before the second Respondent. The eligible benefits to which the Petitioner is found entitled, shall also be disbursed within another one month.

2.

The writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending application (s), if any.