AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
19 paragraphs · 353 wordsTarlok Singh Chauhan, J
The instant petition has been filed for the grant of following substantive relief:
i) That in view of the submissions made in the writ petition, the respondent No. 1 may kindly be directed to decide the representation of the petitioner
in a time bound manner and post him at one of the station of his choice in district Hamirpur as mentioned in para supra.
A perusal of the petition would clearly go to show that the petitioner has claimed the aforesaid relief based on the plea of individual hardship. It is
more than settled that the Courts are extremely slow to interfere directly in personal hardship cases, the clear implication of the almost consistent
directions given in the cases are that the transferee could make a representation to the competent authority.
Reference in this regard can conveniently be made to a judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Rajendra Roy vs. Union of India and
another (1993) 1 SCC 148, wherein it was observed as under:
“7..... The appellant has not made any representation about personal hardship to the department. As such, there was no occasion for the
department to consider such representation. This appeal, therefore, fails and is dismissed, but we make no order as to costs. It is, however, made clear
that the appellant will be free to make representation to the concerned department about personal hardship, if any, being suffered by the appellant in
view of the impugned order. It is reasonable expected that if such representation is made, the same should be considered by the department as
expeditiously as practicable.â€
At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner states that petitioner may very kindly be adjusted against the vacancy which is likely to fall vacant
on 30.06.2021 at GSSS Maid, District Hamirpur. If that be so, respondents may consider the case of the petitioner for posting him preferably at the
aforesaid station, if possible, in accordance with law, within a period of four weeks.
Accordingly, the present writ petition is disposed of, so also pending applications, if any.
Copy dasti.
