High CourtsDivision Bench

Harphul Singh vs State Of H.P. & Ors

High Court Of Himachal Pradesh · Decided on 4 June 2021 · Citation: (2021) 06 SHI CK 0007

HON’BLE JUDGES
Tarlok Singh Chauhan, J · Chander Bhusan Barowalia, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Civil Writ Petition No. 3177 Of 2021
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

19 paragraphs · 353 words

Tarlok Singh Chauhan, J

1.

The instant petition has been filed for the grant of following substantive relief:

i) That in view of the submissions made in the writ petition, the respondent No. 1 may kindly be directed to decide the representation of the petitioner

in a time bound manner and post him at one of the station of his choice in district Hamirpur as mentioned in para supra.

2.

A perusal of the petition would clearly go to show that the petitioner has claimed the aforesaid relief based on the plea of individual hardship. It is

more than settled that the Courts are extremely slow to interfere directly in personal hardship cases, the clear implication of the almost consistent

directions given in the cases are that the transferee could make a representation to the competent authority.

3.

Reference in this regard can conveniently be made to a judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Rajendra Roy vs. Union of India and

another (1993) 1 SCC 148, wherein it was observed as under:

“7..... The appellant has not made any representation about personal hardship to the department. As such, there was no occasion for the

department to consider such representation. This appeal, therefore, fails and is dismissed, but we make no order as to costs. It is, however, made clear

that the appellant will be free to make representation to the concerned department about personal hardship, if any, being suffered by the appellant in

view of the impugned order. It is reasonable expected that if such representation is made, the same should be considered by the department as

expeditiously as practicable.â€​

4.

At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner states that petitioner may very kindly be adjusted against the vacancy which is likely to fall vacant

on 30.06.2021 at GSSS Maid, District Hamirpur. If that be so, respondents may consider the case of the petitioner for posting him preferably at the

aforesaid station, if possible, in accordance with law, within a period of four weeks.

5.

Accordingly, the present writ petition is disposed of, so also pending applications, if any.

Copy dasti.