High CourtsSingle Bench

Harpreet Kaur vs State Of Punjab And Ors

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 29 December 2025 · Citation: (2025) 12 P&H CK 2040

HON’BLE JUDGES
Ramesh Kumari, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Constitution Of India, 1950 — Article 226 · Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 — Section 109, 111, 112 · Arms Act, 1959 — Section 25
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous No. 14090 Of 2025
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

7 paragraphs · 175 words

Ramesh Kumari, J

1.

Present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of habeas corpus for production and release of detenue namely Sandeep Singh from the illegal custody of CIA Staff, Barnala.

2.

Short reply by way of affidavit of Rajinder Pal Singh, PPS, DSP (D), Barnala on behalf of the respondent-State has been filed in Court today and the same is taken on record. Copy thereof has been supplied to the counsel opposite. As per short reply, the relevant portion of para 3 reads as under:-

“xxx xxx xxx

3.

That the alleged detenue/accused Sandeep Singh has been lawfully arrested in FIR No.599 dated 25.12.2025 under Sections 109, 111, 112 of BNS, 2023 and 25 of Arms Act, registered at Police Station City Barnala against him and others. Therefore, the present petition is an abuse of the process of Court.”

3.

Faced with this situation, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present petition.

4.

Dismissed as withdrawn.