Supreme CourtDivision Bench

HARVINDER SINGH vs THE STATE OF HARYANA COLLECTOR

Supreme Court Of India · Decided on 23 April 2018 · Citation: (2018) 4 JT 602

HON’BLE JUDGES
KURIAN JOSEPH, MOHAN M. SHANTANAGOUDAR
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 4282-4283 Of 2018 (ARISING FROM SLP © NOS.10840-10841 OF 2018 @ DIARY NO.22421 Of 2017)

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

14 paragraphs · 173 words

KURIAN, J.

1.Delay condoned.

2.

Leave granted.

3.

In the nature of the order we propose to pass, it is not necessary to issue notice to the respondents.

4.

The appellant is aggrieved by the compensation awarded in the land acquisition referred to in RFA No.3192/2013 on the file of the Punjab and

Haryana at Chandigarh.

5.

We find that all the connected matters have been remitted to the High Court, as agreed by both the sides. We are informed that the matters are still

pending before the High Court.

6.

Therefore, we remit this matter also to the High Court. This matter shall also be considered afresh by the High Court along with the connected

matters, which are now being considered by the High Court.

7.

The appeals are, accordingly, disposed of.

8.

The appellant is directed to serve a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the petition on the respondents.

9.

Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed of.

10.

There shall be no orders as to costs.