AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
3 paragraphs · 117 wordsParty-in-person namely Mr. Navin Purohit, son of Mr. Rameshwar Dayal Purohit is present on behalf of the respondent who is director of the respondent. The party-in-person on behalf of the respondent is seeking time to file reply and it is also submitted by Mr. Navin Purohit that they are ready to settle the matter with the petitioner and also the terms of settlement will be mentioned in the reply. Time to file reply is granted to Mr. Navin Purohit.
This matter is, therefore, adjourned to 3.1.2023.
Mr. Navin Purohit shall remain personally present before this Tribunal on next date of hearing i.e. 3.1.2023 at 11 am or he may engage a lawyer on behalf of the respondent.
