Tribunals and CommissionsSingle Bench

Hathway Digital Ltd vs Krishna Cable 1 & Anr

Telecom Disputes Settlement And Appellate Tribunal · Decided on 5 September 2023 · Citation: (2023) 09 TDSAT CK 0013

HON’BLE JUDGES
Subodh Kumar Gupta, Member
CASE NUMBER
Broadcasting Petition No. 322 Of 2020
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

4 paragraphs · 126 words
1.

At last, after issuance of the notice upon the respondent, now, the counsel Mr. Avinash Pandey, is appearing for respondent and is seeking time to file Vakalatnama, to get instructions and to file reply. Two weeks’ time is granted to file Vakalatnama on behalf of the respondent.

2.

Time to file reply is granted to the respondent, subject to payment of cost of Rs.5,000/-. This cost shall be deposited by the respondent by way of Demand Draft in favour of “TDSAT Employees Welfare Society” within a period of four weeks from today.

3.

The Registry shall accept the reply only upon deposition of the cost. Time to file reply is granted till the next date of hearing.

4.

The matter is, therefore, adjourned to 10.10.2023.