AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
Judgment
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public
Prosecutor. Perused the material available on record.
The instant bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. has
been preferred on behalf of the petitioner who is in custody in
connection with F.I.R. No.209/2016, registered at Police Station
Gangapur, District Bhilwara for the offences under Sections 147,
149, 452, 323, 302 and 354 IPC and Sections 11/12 of the POCSO
Act.
Learned counsel for the petitioner drew the Court''s attention
to the parcha bayan of deceased Pooja wherein she alleged that
she was taking bath on 20.7.2016. Suresh was clandestinely
watching her taking bath from roof top. She threatened Suresh
that she would complain of this indecency to her Mama. Upon
returning to her home, she complained about the incident to her
Mama. Thereafter, relatives of Suresh came to her house and
started quarrelling. She was heating milk at that time and
apprehending that her Mama would scold her, she poured
kerosene on her body and immolated herself. Learned counsel for
the petitioner also drew the attention of the Court to the
statements of the witnesses Jagdish Chandra, Badri Lal and
Lokesh, all of whom stated that Pooja set fire to herself upon
being apprehensive of the actions of the accused persons. He thus
urges that the dying declaration of Pooja recorded on the next day
of incident by the Magistrate wherein she alleged that the present
petitioner poured kerosene upon her and Suresh set fire to her is
unbelievable and hence, the petitioner deserves to be enlarged on
bail.
Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the
submissions advanced by the petitioner''s counsel. He relies upon
the dying declaration of Pooja recorded by the Magistrate and
urges that there is clear allegation in the said statement that
Heera Lal poured kerosene and Suresh set fire to the girl and
thus, the petitioner should not be released on bail.
I have given my thoughtful consideration to the arguments
advanced at the Bar and perused the material available on record.
The FIR was lodged on 20.7.2016 on basis of the parcha
bayan of deceased Pooja recorded by the S.H.O., P.S. Gangapur in
the presence of the medical officer. In such statement, she alleged
that she herself poured kerosene on her body and lighted fire. The
said statement of the deceased is corroborated by the statements
of the witnesses named above who are all her close relatives. The
story was given a twist on the next day i.e. 21.7.2016 when the
dying declaration of Pooja was recorded by the Magistrate at
Government Hospital, Udaipur. In this statement, she alleged that
the petitioner poured kerosene on her person and thereafter,
Suresh set her to fire.
In this background and having regard to the facts and
circumstances as reflected from the record and particularly,
significant contradictions appearing in the two statements of the
deceased and considering that even in the dying declaration
recorded by the Magistrate, the allegation of setting the deceased
to fire is attributed specifically to Suresh, this Court is of the
opinion that the petitioner deserves to be released on bail.
Accordingly, the bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is
allowed and it is directed that the petitioner Heera Lal arrested in
connection with F.I.R. No.209/2016, registered at Police Station
Gangapur, District Bhilwara shall be released on bail provided he
furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- and two surety bonds of
Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with
the stipulation to appear before that Court on all dates of hearing
and as and when called upon to do so.
