AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
9 paragraphs · 483 wordsAnil Verma, J
Applicant has filed this second bail application under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 on behalf of the applicant for grant of regular bail relating to Crime No.321/2023 registered at P.S. Raojibazar, District Indore (M.P.) for commission of offence punishable under Sections 379, 411, 413, 414, 109, 120-B, 392 and 201 of IPC. He is in jail since 22.08.2023.
As per the prosecution story, on 18.08.2023, complainant Mohd. Ameen lodged an FIR at P.S. Raojibazar, Indore, by stating that an unknown person has stolen his mobile phone. During the investigation, co-accused Vicky has been arrested. On the basis of his memorandum co-accused other Arun and present applicant have been arrested in this case and 642 mobile phone have been recovered from the possession of the present applicant. Accordingly, offence under Sections 411 and 414 of IPC have been registered against the present applicant and offence under Section 379 has been registered against the co-accused Vicky.
Learned counsel for the applicant submits that applicant is innocent person and he has been falsely implicated in this matter. Applicant is in jail since 22.08.2023. Investigation is over and charge-sheet has been filed. He is just an employee in a shop and is performing his duty as per instruction of other co-accused Jitendra. He is a permanent resident of District Indore. Final conclusion of trial will take considerable long time. Under the above circumstances, prayer for grant of bail may be considered on such terms and conditions, as this Court deems fit and proper.
Per-contra, learned counsel for respondent/State opposes the bail application and prays for its rejection. However, he fairly admits that no criminal antecedent has been found against the present applicant.
Perused the case diary as well as the impugned order of the court below.
Considering all the facts and circumstances of the case, arguments advanced by counsel for the parties, nature and gravity of allegation as also taking note of the fact that applicant has already suffered jail incarceration for a period of four months; offence is exclusively triable by JMFC; applicant is not having any criminal past; investigation is over and charge-sheet has been filed and final conclusion of trial will take considerable long time. In view of the above, jail incarceration period of the present applicant and other facts, I deem it proper to release the applicant on bail. Therefore, without commenting on the merits of the case, the application is allowed.
It is directed that the applicant be released on bail upon his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.75,000/- (Rupees Seventy Five Thousand only) with one solvent surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court for his appearance before the trial Court, as and when required. He shall abide by the conditions enumerated u/S. 437(3) Cr.P.C.
Certified copy as per rules.
