High CourtsSingle Bench

Hemant Jain And Others vs State Of Madhya Pradesh

Madhya Pradesh High Court · Decided on 5 January 2022 · Citation: (2022) 01 MP CK 0014

HON’BLE JUDGES
Vijay Kumar Shukla, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 438, 438(2) · Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 34, 420
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Miscellaneous Criminal Case No.64886 Of 2021
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

13 paragraphs · 248 words

Vijay Kumar Shukla, J

This is the first application of the applicants under Section 438 of Cr.P.C. for grant of anticipatory bail in connection with Crime No. 561/2021

registered at Police Station Deendayal Nagar, District Ratlam (MP) for the offence punishable under Sections 420 and 34 of IPC.

Counsel for the applicants and complainant submit that the matter has already been compromised by the parties in the terms mentioned in the

application.

 Since the matter has already been compromised by the parties and necessary documents have been filed before this Court and taking into

consideration the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, I find prima-facie case is made out for grant of anticipatory bail, therefore, the

applicants are entitled for grant of anticipatory bail. Accordingly, the application is allowed.

 It is directed that in the event of arrest, applicants - Hemant Jain S/o Rajendra Jain and Smt. Preeti W/o Hemant Jain shall be released on bai on

their furnishing a personal bond in a sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) each with one solvent surety each in the like amount to the

satisfaction of the arresting officer. The applicants shall further abide by other conditions enumerated in sub-section (2) of Section 438 of Cr.P.C.

A typed copy of this order be forwarded by the Registry to the Office of the Advocate General and to Shri S. Seth, learned Panel Lawyer on their

respective email addresses, for intimation to the police station concerned.