AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
20 paragraphs · 375 wordsThe challenge in the present Writ Petition is to the order of suspension which has been issued on 15/12/2015.
The contention of the counsel for the petitioner is that, the respondent/State may reconsider the issue of keeping the petitioner in a prolong
suspension in the light of judgment passed by the Hon ble Supreme’ Court in the case of Ajay Kumar Choudhary v. Union of India (through its
Secretary) and Another [2015 7 SCC 291]. It was further contended that, though the petitioner has been placed under suspension from 15/12/2015 till
date, the petitioner has not been paid with the subsistence allowance.
So far as the first part of the petition is concerned, this Court does not find any strong case made out by the counsel for the petitioner for interfering
with the order of suspension at this juncture for the reason that, the petitioner has been placed under suspension in the light of proviso to rule 9 (1) of
Chhattisgarh Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1966.
The admitted fact is that, the petitioner has been involved in a criminal case in case No.86/2015 for the offence punishable under Section 420, 409,
467, 468 and 471/34 of I.P.C. The said criminal case is still pending consideration before the trial court.
Under the circumstances, the petitioner would remain under suspension as per the proviso to Section 9 (1) of the rules of 1966.
In the given facts i.e. the pendency of the criminal case against the petitioner, the judgment of Supreme Court in the case of Ajay Kumar
Choudhary (Supra) would not be applicable.
However under no circumstances can the respondents deny the
petitioner of subsistence allowance which is payable to him.
The subsistence allowance is provided for the sustenance and survival of the employee during the period that he has been placed under
suspension. The petitioner as it is remained under suspension for a period of 2 years.
The respondents are therefore directed to ensure that the petitioner is paid subsistence allowance forthwith within a period of 60 days from the date
the petitioner makes available the certified copy of this order to the competent authority.
The Writ Petition accordingly stands disposed off.
