High CourtsSingle Bench

Hemaram vs State Of Rajasthan

Rajasthan High Court · Decided on 19 August 2023 · Citation: (2023) 08 RAJ CK 0053

HON’BLE JUDGES
Farjand Ali, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 354, 458 · Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 397, 401
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous Suspension Of Sentence Application No.299 Of 2023 IN S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 1076 Of 2023
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

10 paragraphs · 467 words

Farjand Ali, J

1.

The instant application for suspension of sentence has been moved on behalf of the applicant in the matter of judgment dated 19.04.2018 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, Osian, District- Jodhpur in Regular Criminal Case No.619/2009 whereby the petitioner was convicted and sentenced to suffer maximum punishment of two years simple imprisonment along with compensation fine of Rs.5,000/- under Section 458 of IPC and lesser punishment for other offences under Section 354 IPC.

2.

It is contended on behalf of the applicant that the learned trial Judge has not appreciated the correct, legal and factual aspects of the matter and thus, reached at an erroneous conclusion of guilt, therefore, the same is required to be appreciated again by this Court. Hearing of the revision petition is likely to take long time, therefore, the application for suspension of sentence may be granted.

3.

Per contra, learned Additional Government Advocate has vehemently opposed the prayer made on behalf of the accused-applicant for releasing the petitioner on application for suspension of sentence.

4.

Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record.

5.

Upon consideration of the submissions of learned counsel for the parties and looking to the totality of facts and circumstances of the case, more particularly the fact that hearing of revision petition is likely to take further more time and considering the overall submissions while refraining from passing any comments on the niceties of the matter and the defects of the prosecution as the same may put an adverse effect on hearing of the petition, this Court is of the opinion that it is a fit case for suspending the sentence awarded to the accused-petitioner.

6.

Accordingly, the application for suspension of sentence filed under Section 397/401 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is ordered that the sentence passed by learned Judicial Magistrate, Osian, District- Jodhpur in Regular Criminal Case No.619/2009 against the petitioner-applicant- Hemaram S/o Shri Bhikharam shall remain suspended till final disposal of the aforesaid revision petition and he shall be released on bail provided each executes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/-with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance in this Court on 19.09.2023 and whenever ordered to do so till the disposal of the revision petition on the conditions indicated below:-

1.

That he will appear before the trial Court in the month of January of every year till the revision is decided.

2.

That if the applicant change the place of residence, he will give in writing his changed addresses to the trial Court as well as to the counsel in the High Court.

3.

Similarly, if the sureties change their addresses, they will give in writing their changed address to the trial Court.