AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
17 paragraphs · 329 wordsSandeep Sharma, J
By way of present Contempt Petition, prayer has been made on behalf of the petitioner for initiation of contempt proceedings against the
respondents for having intentionally and deliberately disobeyed the judgment dated 13.08.2020 passed by Division Bench of this Court in CWP
No.2815 of 2020, titled as Het Ram versus H.P.T.D.C & another.
Careful perusal of aforesaid judgment, alleged to have been violated, (Annexure C-1), reveals that Division Bench of this Court while disposing of
the petition, directed the respondents to release the admissible retiral benefits in accordance with law. It was further directed by Division Bench of this
Court that 50% of such benefits be released within two weeks from the date of the judgment and the remaining amount alongwith statutory interest be
released within two months thereafter. Since despite there being specific direction to do the needful, as taken note above, respondents have failed to
release the retiral benefits to the petitioner, he has approached this Court in the instant proceedings.
Mr. Naresh Kaul, learned counsel representing the respondents while accepting notice on behalf of the respondents states that though he has every
reason to believe and presume that by now aforesaid judgment alleged to have been violated, must have been complied with, but if not, same would be
complied with within a period of four weeks from today.
Consequently, in view of the fair statement made by learned counsel representing the respondents, this Court sees no reason to keep the present
petition alive and as such, same is accordingly disposed of with the direction to the respondents to do the needful within a period of four weeks, if not
already done, failing which, they would further aggravate the contempt. Petitioner is at liberty to get the present proceedings revived in case aforesaid
judgment is not complied with, so that appropriate action, in accordance with law is taken against erring official. Notices issued to the respondents are
hereby discharged accordingly.
