High CourtsDivision Bench

Hetal vs Ramesh Kumar

Rajasthan High Court · Decided on 7 October 2023 · Citation: (2023) 10 RAJ CK 0064

HON’BLE JUDGES
Arun Bhansali, J · Rajendra Prakash Soni, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code Of Civil Procedure, 1908 — Order 9 Rule 13
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 1528 Of 2023
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

4 paragraphs · 169 words
1.

This appeal is directed against the judgment & decree dated 07.10.2022 passed by the Additional District Judge, Sumerpur, District Pali, whereby the said Court has passed ex-parte decree dissolving the marriage between the appellant & the respondent.

2.

A perusal of the record indicates that against the ex-parte decree, the present appeal has been filed and the plea taken in the appeal essentially is for seeking setting aside the ex-parte decree. For seeking setting aside the ex-parte decree, the appellant is first required to approach the court, which passed the ex-parte decree under Order IX, Rule 13 CPC. The appeal against the judgment & decree dated 07.10.2022 could only be filed on its merit.

3.

In view of the above fact situation, learned counsel for the appellant seeks withdrawal of the appeal with liberty to approach the trial court by way of appropriate proceedings including application under Order IX, Rule 13 CPC.

4.

Consequently, the appeal filed by the appellant is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid.