High CourtsSingle Bench

Himadri Bag And Others vs Union Of India

Orissa High Court · Decided on 5 October 2023 · Citation: (2023) 10 OHC CK 0170

HON’BLE JUDGES
B.P. Routray, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
FAO No.415 Of 2023

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

9 paragraphs · 242 words

B.P. Routray, J

1.The matter is taken up through Hybrid mode.

2.

Heard Mr.Mishra, learned counsel for the Appellants and Mr.Jena, learned Central Government Counsel for the Respondent-Union of India.

3.

It is submitted on behalf of the Appellants that challenge in the present appeal against the direction of keeping 90% of the compensation amount in fixed deposit is covered by a similar judgment of this court.

4.

It is admitted by both parties that the challenge in the present appeal is squarely covered by the decision of this Court rendered in FAO No.262 of 2020 and batch, disposed of on 9th September, 2021.

5.

Accordingly, the present appeal is disposed of in terms of the principles decided in said decision of this Court with a direction to disburse entire compensation amount in favour of the claimants  by keeping 50% of shares fall due to Appellant No.1, 4 & 5 (Himadri Bag, Natha Bag and Sakuntala Bag) in fixed deposit in their names in any Nationalized bank for a period of five years, and the total amount fall due to the shares of minor Appellants No.2 & 3 (Sunaya Bag and Kajal Bag) shall be kept in fixed deposits separately in any Nationalized Bank till they attain majority or for a period of five years, whichever is later.

6.

With aforesaid observation and direction, the FAO is  disposed of.

7.

Urgent certified copy of this order be granted on proper  application.

……………………………………