AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
43 paragraphs · 493 wordsCrl. Misc. No. 19617 of 2017
The application is allowed and documents Annexures P-7 and P-8
are taken on record, subject to all just exceptions.
CRM stands disposed of.
Crl. Misc. M - 21382 of 2017
The petitioner is seeking direction for release of her passport and
granting her permission to go United Kingdom to enable her to attend the
wedding reception of her son, which is to be celebrated on 1st and 2nd July, 2017.
The petitioner is a practising lawyer at Delhi and is facing trial in
case FIR No. 85, dated 21.03.2016, under Sections 147, 149, 456, 457, 447, 448,
395, 120-B IPC registered at Police Station Ambala Cantt., District Ambala.
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the marriage of son of
the petitioner, namely, Gaurav Gupta, was solemnised with Sayana Maria
Gonzalez on 05.10.2016 in Delhi. The wedding reception of her son
and daughter-in-law has been fixed for 1st and 2nd July, 2017 in London. The
petitioner being the only living parent of the bride-groom and her presence is
very much mandatory for the occasion. The said celebration would be attended
by all the family members of the bride and the bride-groom.
Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes that if the petitioner is
permitted to go abroad, she would abide by all the conditions that would be
imposed upon her by the Court.
Learned State counsel on the other hand contends that the petitioner
is guilty of having misappropriated the trust property and there is every
apprehension that the petitioner would not return to face the trial.
Be that as it may, the petitioner at present is only facing trial. She
has not been convicted by any Court of law. The right to go abroad is a
fundamental right. The apprehension of respondent-State that the petitioner may
not return to face trial can be taken care of by directing her to furnish heavy
security.
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that in order to allay any
apprehension of the petitioner evading any process of law in addition to any
other surety as may be directed by the trial Court, the petitioner would also
deposit original title deed of property of her son namely, Gaurav Gupta, i.e B-
444, Basement and Ground Floor, New Friends Colony, New Delhi.
Accordingly this petition is allowed. The respondents are directed
to release the passport of the petitioner to enable her to visit United Kingdom,
for a period of two weeks'' on her furnishing bonds/surety to the satisfaction of
the trial Court. Additionally the petitioner would also deposit with the trial Court
the original title deed of property of her son as mentioned above. The petitioner
will return and surrender her passport before the trial Court on or before
05.07.2017.
A copy of this order be given to learned counsel for the petitioner
under the signatures of Special Secretary of this Court.
