High CourtsSingle Bench

Himanshu Kabadwal & others vs State of Uttarakhand and another

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 8 January 2018 · Citation: (2018) 01 UK CK 0053

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sudhanshu Dhulia
CASE NUMBER
1802 of 2017

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

13 paragraphs · 189 words
1.

Mr. M.S. Pal, Senior Advocate assisted by Mr. Suraj Pandey, Advocate for the applicants.

2.

Ms. Mamta Joshi, Brief Holder, present for the State/respondent No.1.

3.

The First Information Report has been lodged by respondent No.2, which has been registered as FIR No.80 of 2017 under Sections 147, 332.

353, 352, 504 and 186 of IPC, at Police Station- Lalkuan, District- Nainital against the present applicants. After investigation police submitted the

charge sheet against the present applicants. Consequently, the learned Magistrate took cognizance in the matter and issued summons against the

applicants. Hence the present application has been filed by the applicants under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., invoking the inherent jurisdiction of this

Court.

4.

Considering the overall facts and circumstances of the case and the nature of offence, no interference is being called for by this Court in the

matter.

5.

Let the applicants appear before the learned Magistrate and move their bail application, the same shall be considered, as far as possible on the

same day itself on its merit in accordance with law

2

6.

The application filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., stands disposed.