AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
6 paragraphs · 234 wordsIn wake of onslaught of COVID-19, lawyers have been advised to refrain from coming to the Courts.
This Court perused the material available on record. The petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No.99/2020 of Police Station Salumber, District Udaipur for the offences punishable under Sections 323, 447, 326 IPC and Sections 4/5 Arms Act. He has preferred this bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C.
The petitioner is in custody since 10.05.2020 and the alleged offences are triable by Magistrate.
Learned Public Prosecutor opposed the bail application.
Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case as also the fact that conclusion of the proceedings is likely to take some time and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to grant bail to the accused petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C.
Accordingly, this bail application filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioner Hiralal S/o Dhula shall be released on bail in connection with FIR No.99/2020 of Police Station Salumber, District Udaipur provided he executes a personal bond in a sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for his appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial.