High CourtsSingle Bench

H.M. Prasanth Kumar vs Basoor Nataraja

Karnataka High Court · Decided on 10 February 2025 · Citation: (2025) 02 KAR CK 0873

HON’BLE JUDGES
Shivashankar Amarannavar, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Appeal No. 1165 Of 2020 (A)
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 136 words

Shivashankar Amarannavar, J

1.

Learned counsel for the appellant is absent. There is no representation for the appellant. On 07.11.2024, this Court has passed the following order:

" Learned counsel for the appellant prays for time.

The appeal is of the year 2020 and it is listed for the fourth time for compliance of office objections. I do not find any reason to adjourn the matter.

However, to afford a final opportunity, list after one week."

2.

Inspite of the said order, learned counsel for the appellant has not complied the office objections. The appeal is listed today for compliance of office objections for the fifth time. There are no reasons for adjournment. It appears that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the appeal. Hence, the appeal is dismissed for non compliance of office objections.