High CourtsSingle Bench

Honey Kharbanda vs State

Delhi High Court · Decided on 5 February 2019 · Citation: (2019) 02 DEL CK 0560

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sunil Gaur, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Bail Application No. 209 Of 2018, Criminal Miscellaneous Application No. 1570 Of 2018

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

8 paragraphs · 236 words

Sunil Gaur, J

Petitioner seeks pre-arrest bail in FIR No. 363/2016 under Sections 498A/406/377 of IPC registered at police station Rajinder Nagar, Delhi.

While entertaining this bail application, interim protection was granted to petitioner vide order of 22nd February, 2018 and the matter was referred to mediation.

Although, the settlement could not be arrived at between the parties in the mediation proceedings but petitioner-husband and the complainant-wife have mutually resolved their disputes and have agreed to live together. It is so stated by petitioner who appears in person and the complainant-Kanchan Kharbanda of this FIR, who has been identified to be so, by Investigating Officer on the basis of identity proof produced by her.

Petitioner-husband as well as the complainant-wife submits that they want to live together and they will be going from this Court together and so, this application be accordingly disposed of.

Without commenting on the merits of this case, interim order of 22nd February, 2018 is made absolute. In the event of arrest, petitioner be admitted to bail subject to his furnishing bail bond in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- with one local surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Investigating Officer.

It is made clear that if the marriage of complainant-wife with petitioner-husband again runs into rough weather, then this order will not stand in her way to have recourse to law.

The bail application is accordingly disposed of.