High CourtsSingle Bench

ICICI Bank Ltd. vs B. Anusya

Madras High Court · Decided on 25 November 2009 · Citation: (2009) 11 MAD CK 0040

HON’BLE JUDGES
M. Venugopal, J
CASE NUMBER
C.R.P. (NPD) . No''s. 2864, 3708 and 3709 of 2008 and M.P. No. 1 of 2008
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

43 paragraphs · 851 words

M. Venugopal, J.—Today the petitioner B. Anusya and the representative of the respondent Bank are present before this Court.

2.

The respondent Bank, The Regional Head, Chennai-600 014 has issued a letter dated 18/11/2009 inter alia mentioning that he has authorised

Mr. D. Santhosh Prabhu, Infra Facility Manager to represent him before this Court and to file the memo of compromise on his behalf which is duly

signed by him.

3.

It is represented before this Court on behalf of the respective parties to the proceedings in these revisions that the parties have entered into a

Memo of Compromise dated 17.11.2009 filed before this Court on 20.11.2009 and the Consent Terms are as follows:

i. The petitioner confirms that she is the Principal Lessee under the Lease Deed dated 02.05.1985 and as such she is legally entitled to lease out

the said premises to the respondent.

ii. The respondent today paid arrears of rent for the ground floor and first floor of the premises to the Petitioner at Rs. 86,41,407/- (Rupees Eighty

Six Lakhs Forty One thousand Four hundred and Seven only) less TDS as on September, 2009 and hence a net sum of Rs. 77,77,266/- (Rupees

Seventy seven lakhs seventy seven thousand two hundred and sixty six only) is paid to the petitioner vide Banker''s Cheque No. 784963 dated

09.11.2009 calculated based on the fair rent fixed by the Hon''ble Rent Control Appellate Authority and the petitioner hereby admits and

acknowledges receipt of the said amount towards full and final settlement of all the claims of the petitioner against the respondent Bank in respect

of the subject lease in the above CRPs.

iii. It is further agreed that the respondent shall pay Rs. 1,46,343/- as the rent payable for the ground and first floor portion of October 2009 within

a week from this date. The sum of Rs. 1,46,343/- payable for the ground and first floor portion towards rent for the period November 1, 2009 to

November 30, 2009 shall be paid on or before December 10, 2009.

iv. The petitioner agrees to continue the lease of the ground floor of the said premises subject to actual measurements with the respondent Bank for

a period of 3 years on a monthly rent calculated at the rate of Rs. 95/- per Sq.Ft. On built up area and a separate Lease Deed shall be executed

between the petitioner and the respondent setting out the terms and conditions governing the lease. The respondent Bank shall also pay a rental

security deposit equivalent to 10 months rent for the said ground floor of the premises, simultaneously at the time of execution of a separate lease

deed.

v. As the first floor of the said premises is no longer required by the respondent, the respondent has surrendered the First Floor of the said

premises to the petitioner comprising of 2545 Sq.Ft. with effect from November 30, 2009 and the petitioner has taken possession thereof in as is

where is condition. A separate letter of Handing Over possession has been addressed by the respondent to the petitioner, duly acknowledged by

the petitioner.

vi. Both the petitioner and the respondent agree and undertake to get the Civil Revision Petitions filed by them in CRP.(NPD). No. 2864 of 2008,

CRP.(NPD). No. 3708 of 2008 and CRP.(NPD). No. 3709 of 2008 disposed as settled in terms of this memo.

vii. The petitioner hereby agrees to withdraw the eviction petition filed by her in RCOP No. 737 of 2009, before X Small Causes Court, Chennai,

against the respondent Bank, in view of the settlement entered into between the parties as aforesaid and in consideration of the agreed terms and

conditions herein above mentioned.

6.

The parties hereto confirm that they have entered into these Consent Terms in consideration of their respective benefits in the premises

sufficiency of which is irrevocably by each of them.

7.

The petitioner confirms that she has removed all the barricades and stalls put up by the petitioner in front of the Branch Premises and ATM and

allow the respondent to function without any hindrance whatsoever.

8.

The petitioner further confirms that she will have no claim whatsoever against the respondent Bank before any Court of other forum in respect of

the subject lease and any matter relating thereto including claim for arrears of rent etc.

9.

These consent terms shall be deemed to be the memo of settlement for the above said CRP. (NPD). No. 2864 of 2008, CRP.(NPD). No.

3708 of 2008 and CRP.(NPD). No. 3709 of 2008 and RCOP No. 737 of 2009.

4.

The tenor and contents of compromise have been read over to the parties viz., the petitioner B. Anusya (landlady) and the representative of the

respondent Bank D. Santhosh Prabhu and they have appears to have understood the same. It is made clear that the said memorandum of

compromise shall form part and parcel of the record and by virtue of the memorandum of compromise entered into between the parties, these civil

revision petitions are disposed of without costs as settled between the parties. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.