High CourtsSingle Bench

IFFCO TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD vs NARESH KUMAR & ORS

Delhi High Court · Decided on 23 May 2018 · Citation: (2018) 05 DEL CK 0330

HON’BLE JUDGES
J.R. MIDHA
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
MAC.APP. 596 OF 2017 and C.M. Appl. 24806 OF 2017

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

28 paragraphs · 526 words

J.R. MIDHA, J.

1.

The parties have challenged the award of the Claims Tribunal whereby compensation of Rs.11,59,000/- has been awarded to the legal

representatives of Kunal. The accident dated 25th February, 2015 resulted in the death of Kunal. The deceased was aged 18 years at the time of the

accident and was working on commission basis in fruit market at Azadpur. The deceased was survived by his parents, who filed the application for

compensation before the Claims Tribunal.

2.

The Claims Tribunal took Rs.9,048/- as minimum wages, deducted 1/3rd towards his personal expenses and applied the multiplier of 14 to compute

the loss of dependency as Rs.10,13,376/-. The Claims Tribunal awarded Rs.1 lakh towards loss of love and affection, Rs.20,000/- towards loss of

estate and Rs.25,000/- towards funeral expenses. The total compensation awarded is Rs.11,59,000/-.

3.

Learned counsel for the appellant in MAC. APP. 596/2017 urged at the time of hearing that minimum wages of Rs.8,632/- be taken into

consideration and the personal expenses of the deceased be taken as one half. It is further submitted that non-pecuniary compensation be reduced in

terms of the principles laid down in National Insurance Co. Limited vs. Pranay Sethi and Ors. 2017 SCC Online SC 1270.

4.

Learned counsel for the claimants submits that 40% be added towards future prospects and multiplier of 18 be applied according to the age of the

deceased.

5.

There is merit in the contentions urged by learned counsels for both the parties. The minimum wages as on the date of the accident were Rs.8,632/-

which are taken into consideration for computing the compensation, 40% is added towards future prospects, 50% is deducted towards personal

expenses and multiplier of 18 is applied according to the age of the deceased. The compensation of Rs.1 lakh towards loss of love and affection is set

aside. The compensation for loss of estate and funeral expenses is reduced to Rs.15,000/- each.

6.

Taking the income of the deceased as Rs.8,632/- per month, adding 40% towards future prospects, deducting 50% towards personal expenses and

applying the multiplier of 18, the loss of dependency is computed as Rs.13,05,158.4. Adding Rs.15,000/- towards loss of estate and Rs.15,000/-

towards funeral expenses, the total compensation is computed as Rs.13,35,158.4 rounded off to Rs.13,35,200/-.

7.

Both the appeals are partially allowed and the compensation amount is enhanced from Rs.11,59,000/- to Rs.13,35,200/-.

8.

The appellant in MAC. APP. 596/2017 has deposited the award amount before the Claims Tribunal out of which 40% amount has been released to

claimants and the balance amount is lying with the Claims Tribunal. The Claims Tribunal is directed to send the balance amount to the Registrar

General of this Court and the disbursement order of the same shall be passed by this Court along with the enhanced amount.

9.

The enhanced compensation along with upto date interest be deposited by the appellant with the Registrar General of this Court within six weeks.

10.

Pending application is disposed of.

11.

List for disbursement of the compensation amount on 26th July, 2018.

12.

Copy of this judgment be given dasti to counsels for the parties under signatures of the Court Master.