High CourtsSingle Bench

Iffco Tokio General Insurance Co. Ltd. vs Ram Swaroop and Others

Delhi High Court · Decided on 4 May 2012 · Citation: (2012) 05 DEL CK 0394

HON’BLE JUDGES
G.P. Mittal, J
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
MAC. APP. 330 of 2011
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

8 paragraphs · 383 words

G. P. Mittal, J.—The Appeal is for reduction of the compensation of Rs. 16,07,900/- awarded for the death of Kailash who died in a motor accident which occurred on 19.02.2008. There is twin challenge to the impugned judgment. It is urged that the Respondents No.1 to 6 were not entitled to the grant of future prospects for lack of any evidence in this regard. Secondly, it is contended that a compensation of Rs. 1,50,000/- awarded towards Loss of Love and Affection was on the higher side.

2.

The Respondents No.1 to 6 produced PW-1 Mange Ram, Accountant of the deceased''s employer. He testified that the deceased was working with their firm as an Executive Manager since the year 2001. Although, the salary slips for the year 2001 to 2006 were not filed, the salary slip for the current year shows an increase of Rs. 500/- in the basic salary from the month of March, 2007 onwards. Thus, it was established that the deceased was in permanent employment and was getting increments. The Claims Tribunal rightly granted future prospects.

3.

The Claims Tribunal awarded a sum of Rs. 1,50,000/- towards Loss of Love and Affection. Loss of love and affection can never be measured in terms of money. Thus, uniformity has to be adopted by the Courts while granting non-pecuniary damages. The Supreme Court in Sunil Sharma and Others Vs. Bachitar Singh and Others, and in Baby Radhika Gupta and Others Vs. Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. and Others, granted only Rs. 25,000/- (in total to all the claimants) under the head of loss of love and affection. Thus, I would reduce the compensation under this head to Rs. 25,000/- only.

4.

The overall compensation is thus reduced from Rs. 16,07,900/- to Rs. 14,82,900/-.

5.

The compensation of Rs. 14,82,900/- shall be disbursed in favour of the Respondents No.1 to 6 in terms of the order passed by the Claims Tribunal.

6.

The excess amount of Rs. 1,25,000/- along with the proportionate interest and the interest accrued during the pendency of the Appeal @ 7.5 % per annum, shall be refunded to the Appellant Insurance Company.

7.

The statutory amount of Rs. 25,000/- shall also be refunded to the Appellant Insurance Company.

8.

The Appeal is allowed in above terms. Pending application stands disposed of.