AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
14 paragraphs · 381 wordsSheel Nagu, Judge
Case Diary is perused. Learned counsel for the rival parties are heard.
The applicant has filed this first application u/s 439, Cr.P.C. for grant of bail. The applicant has been arrested by Police Station Gole Ka Mandir, District Gwalior in connection with Crime No. 443/2012 registered in relation to the offence punishable u/s. 379 IPC.
Learned Panal Lawyer for the State opposed the application and prayed for its rejection by contending that on the basis of the allegations and the material available on record, no case for grant of bail is made out.
Considering the facts that applicant is in custody since 03.08.2012 and the investigation stands completed and the subject matter of theft which are batteries have been seized from the applicant and looking to the nature of offence and the period of incarceration and early conclusion of trial court is a bleak possibility and pre-trial detention being anathema to the concept of liberty, this Court is inclined to extend the benefit of bail to the applicant.
Accordingly, this application is allowed and it is directed that the applicant be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 50,000/- (Rs. Fifty Thousand only) with two solvent sureties in the like amount to the satisfaction of the concerned Trial Court. This order will remain operative subject to compliance of the following conditions by the applicant :-
The applicant will comply with all the terms and conditions of the bond executed by him;
The applicant will cooperate in the investigation/trial, as the case may be;
The applicant will not indulge himself in extending inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him/her from disclosing such facts to the Court or to the Police Officer, as the case may be;
The applicant shall not commit an offence similar to the offence of which he is accused;
The applicant will not seek unnecessary adjournments during the trial; and
The applicant will not leave India without previous permission of the trial Court/Investigating Officer, as the case may be.
A copy of this order be sent to the Court concerned for compliance.
C.c. as per rules.
