AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
1 paragraphs · 107 wordsPearson, J.—The main question raised by this appeal is whether the gift of a defined share of landed estates is open to the objection which attaches under Muhammadan law, to the gift of joint and undivided property. On this question our opinion is in accord with that of the Court of First Instance that a defined share in a landed estate is a separate property to the gift of which that objection is inapplicable, and we conceive that the view of the matter which we take in common with the Subordinate Judge is sanctioned by the rulings of the Privy Council as well as well-founded in reason.
