High CourtsDivision Bench

In Re: A.T. Kava

Madras High Court · Decided on 9 December 1938 · Citation: AIR 1939 Mad 524 : (1939) 49 LW 494 : (1939) 1 MLJ 700

HON’BLE JUDGES
Lakshmana Rao, J
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

11 paragraphs · 243 words

Lakshmana Rao, J.—The petitioner is the owner of motor lorry S.K. 1089 registered for private trade purposes and he has been convicted

u/s 174(a) of the District Municipalities Act read with Section 313(1) for using the lorry on the public streets in the Municipality of Mangalore

without requisite license for a motor lorry plying for hire.

2.

The lorry of the petitioner was hired out for transporting coffee-husk from Chickmagalur to Mangalore on 2nd and 9th September, 1937, and it

was used for that purpose on those occasions on the public streets in the Municipality of Mangalore. The lorry was obviously a lorry plying for hire

though it was registered for private trade purposes, and the petitioner had no licence for a motor lorry plying for hire as required by Section 174(a)

of the District Municipalities Act. The section provides that no person shall use any motor lorry on any public street in any municipality except on a

licence obtained from the executive authority, and it is immaterial where the act of hiring takes place. It is the user of the lorry that is relevant and

the guilt of the petitioner u/s 174(a) read with Section 313(1) admits of no doubt. The conviction is therefore right but the fine of Rs. 75 in addition

to the license fee is excessive. The fine is therefore reduced to Rs. 25 and otherwise this petition is dismissed. The excess of fine if levied will be

refunded.