High CourtsDivision Bench

In Re: Bojji Reddi and Others

Madras High Court · Decided on 15 March 1938 · Citation: AIR 1938 Mad 686 : (1938) 47 LW 740 : (1938) 1 MLJ 871

HON’BLE JUDGES
Burn, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Criminal Procedure Code, 1898 (CrPC) — Section 307
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

9 paragraphs · 229 words

Burn, J.—As Waller, J., observed in Pachaimuthu, In Re: Pachaimuthu alias Chinnapayyan and Others, , we must decline to accept the

reference which is premature. The learned Sessions Judge is bound to dispose of the case in so far as the offences triable with the aid of assessors

are concerned. He is not competent to refer the case of those offences to this Court, nor can his reference give this Court'' jurisdiction to dispose

of them. Moreover from his letter of reference it would appear that the learned Sessions Judge is not prepared to express disagreement with the

verdict of the jury so far as the first and the second accused are concerned. If that be so, the learned Sessions Judge must dispose of the case as

against them. He cannot refer to this Court u/s 307 of the Criminal Procedure Code the case of anybody in regard to whom he is in agreement with

the verdict of the jury. The case will therefore go back to the learned Sessions Judge for disposal according to law. We, may add that we have

consulted the learned Public Prosecutor and he has said that if this reference had come up for disposal today, he would not have been able to

contend that the verdict of the jury is in any way perverse or unreasonable or against the weight of the evidence.