AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
9 paragraphs · 229 wordsBurn, J.—As Waller, J., observed in Pachaimuthu, In Re: Pachaimuthu alias Chinnapayyan and Others, , we must decline to accept the
reference which is premature. The learned Sessions Judge is bound to dispose of the case in so far as the offences triable with the aid of assessors
are concerned. He is not competent to refer the case of those offences to this Court, nor can his reference give this Court'' jurisdiction to dispose
of them. Moreover from his letter of reference it would appear that the learned Sessions Judge is not prepared to express disagreement with the
verdict of the jury so far as the first and the second accused are concerned. If that be so, the learned Sessions Judge must dispose of the case as
against them. He cannot refer to this Court u/s 307 of the Criminal Procedure Code the case of anybody in regard to whom he is in agreement with
the verdict of the jury. The case will therefore go back to the learned Sessions Judge for disposal according to law. We, may add that we have
consulted the learned Public Prosecutor and he has said that if this reference had come up for disposal today, he would not have been able to
contend that the verdict of the jury is in any way perverse or unreasonable or against the weight of the evidence.
