AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
1 paragraphs · 136 wordsRichard Garth, C.J.—As the Magistrate states that riot or affray was imminent, and that ho considered that the direction he gave tended to prevent, and was likely to prevent, a riot or affray, and as the facts stated by the Magistrate show that there were some grounds for the opinion which he expressed, we think that lie had power, u/s 518 of the Criminal Procedure Code, to make the order complained of. This Court, therefore, cannot interfere with it u/s 15 of the Statute 24 and 25 Vict., cap. 104; nor can the Court interfere on any other ground, as by Section 520 the order made is declared not to be a judicial proceeding, however much it may infringe upon what are, or may be (irrespective of this section), the undoubted legal rights of the petitioners.
