AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
1 paragraphs · 157 wordsMacpherson, J.—Without deciding the general question argued before me as to the age of majority of Hindus subject to the ordinary original jurisdiction of this Court, I am of opinion that probate should, in this case, be refused. It appears plain to me that the testator, by the words used in his will, as to the petitioner''s coming of age, contemplated his arrival at an age when he should be able to exercise full control over the property. The testator''s estate consists to a large extent of immoveable property in the Mofussil, where Act XL of 1858 certainly prevails; and in respect of that portion of the estate, the petitioner has not come of age, as has been conclusively decided by a Full Bench in the case of Madhusudan Manji v. Debi Gobinda Newgi 1 B.L.R. F.B. 49. The general question is in a complicated and unsatisfactory state, and I abstain from expressing any opinion upon it.
