AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
15 paragraphs · 375 wordsAbdur Rahim, J.—There is absolutely no warrant for the order of the Sub-Divisional Magistrate. There is no evidence to show that the
accused were likely to commit a breach of the peace or disturb the public tranquility or do any act, which would probably occasion a breach of the
peace. All that is found is that on a previous occasion, about a year ago, the Nadars asserted their right to carry palkis through the public street on
occasions of marriage, and there was a breach of the peace as some people in the village opposed the Nadars taking palkis in procession on the
ground apparently of the Nadars'' caste which, in their opponents'' estimation, is not high enough to justify their using palkis during marriage.
Nothing particular happened at the time the present proceedings were instituted, except that the marriage season was fast approaching and the
police and the Sub-Divisional Magistrate were apprehensive that if the Nadars insisted on their right as before and the other party opposed them
there might be a disturbance. It is not even shewn that the accused had any marriages to celebrate in their family, and that they were preparing to
carry palkis in procession. All that is alleged against them is that they are leading men of their community. Supposing that some of the Nadars or
the accused themselves wanted this year to take palanquins in procession through streets, they would have every right to do so and if any person
wanted unlawfully to oppose them in the exercise of such right, it is they that ought to be bound then and not persons who were lawfully exercising
or wanted to exercise their ordinary right. It is the duty of the Sub-Divisional officer who is responsible for the peace of his division to use his
authority for the protection of persons who seek to exercise a right which the law allows them and to restrain persons who threaten to obstruct the
exercise of such right,'' and for this purpose to enforce, if necessary, the provisions of Section 107, Criminal Procedure Code, not against the
former but against the latter. I set aside the order u/s 107, Criminal Procedure Code, and the bonds executed by the accused will be discharged.
