High CourtsSingle Bench(1929) 08 MAD CK 0047

In Re: Mohamad Kasim Sahib

Madras High Court · Decided on 9 August 1929 · Citation: 123 Ind. Cas. 351

HON’BLE JUDGES
Curgenven, J

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

1 paragraphs · 131 words

Curgenven, J.—The effect of the decision in Sheorania v. Bharat Singh 20 A. 90 : A.W.N. (1897) 203 is very considerably weakened by that in Baldeo v. John Singh 22 A. 55 : (1899) A.W.N. 172 which holds that a defect in the signature of a plaint or even the absence of any signature, it being found that the suit was filed with the knowledge and consent of the plaintiff, is not ordinarily a ground for interference in appeal. Much less then is it a ground for interference by a District Munsif u/s 73 of the Village Courts Act, or by this Court in exercise of its powers of revision, if petitioner cannot assert any specific prejudice to himself arising out of the irregularity. I, therefore, dismiss the Civil Revision Petition.