High CourtsSingle Bench

In Re: Nobedeep Chunder Shaw, an Insolvent

Calcutta High Court · Decided on 5 May 1886 · Citation: (1886) ILR (Cal) 68

HON’BLE JUDGES
Norris, J
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

1 paragraphs · 127 words

Norris, J.—I do not think it necessary that I should take time to consider what judgment I should give in this case, or encumber the record with an elaborate investigation of the older authorities in a case where the question is set at rest by the decision of the Appeal Court In Ex parte Jones L.R. 18 Ch. D. 109, the principle of which was adopted in the Court of Appeal in Ireland in the case of In re Rainys 3 Ir. L. Rep. Ch. 459. It seems to me that the provisions of the Contract Act are much stronger than the Infants Relief Act, a provision which formed the basis of the decision in Ex parte Jones. I therefore think this adjudication should be set aside.