High CourtsSingle Bench

In Re: Oomayan alias Baluchamy

Madras High Court · Decided on 1 May 1959 · Citation: (1960) 1 MLJ 83

HON’BLE JUDGES
Somasundaram, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Criminal Procedure Code, 1898 (CrPC) — Section 341, 361 · Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Section 201, 302
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 315 words

Somasundaram, J.—This is a reference u/s 341 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The accused is charged u/s 201 read with Section 302 , Indian Penal Code. The Magistrate has committed the accused to Sessions. In paragraph 2 of his letter of reference the Magistrate states:

Oomayan alias Baluchamy accused in this case is completely deaf and dumb and unable to understand the proceedings. Therefore, Sri Williams, the Headmaster, Municipal Deaf and Dumb School, Karaikudi, was engaged and the proceedings of the Court were explained to the accused by signs as required u/s 361, Criminal Procedure Code and the accused understood the proceedings.

2.

To begin with, Section 361 cannot apply to this case, because under that section whenever any evidence is given in a language not understood by the accused, it should be interpreted to him in open Court in a language understood by him. A deaf and dumb man can understand by signs and gestures. Signs and gestures do not form a language, though loosely it may be called the language of the deaf and dumb. But that is not meant by Section 361. Section 361 therefore does not apply.

3.

In the earlier portion of paragraph 2 of his letter the Magistrate finds that the accused is completely deaf and dumb and unable to understand the proceedings. Subsequently, in the same paragraph he says that the accused understood the proceedings. Section 341 says:

If the accused, though not insane, cannot be made to understand the proceedings, the Court may proceed with the enquiry....

4.

But in this case the Magistrate himself finds that the accused understood the proceedings. I am unable to see how this reference lies to this Court. The reference is therefore returned. It is for the Sessions Judge to whom the case has been committed to consider whether this is a case for reference u/s 341, Criminal Procedure Code.