AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
3 paragraphs · 244 wordsJohn Beaumont Kt., C.J.—The applicant who is the Secretary of the Gujarat Lawyers'' Association applied to the Additional City Magistrate''s Court, Ahmedabad, for certified copies of the depositions and statement of Dr. Kanuga in the case of Emperor v. Dr. Kanuga in which Dr. Kanuga was charged u/s 17(7) of the Criminal Law Amendment Act. The applicant desires to apply in revision as a third party and he suggests that he is a person affected by the order within s 548 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The learned Magistrate refused his application on the ground that the applicant was not a person affected by the order, and I entirely agree with the learned Magistrate. Mr. Chhatrapati on behalf of the applicant in this Court has referred us to the case of Emperor v. Ladli Prasad Zuishi I.L.R (1931) All. 724 and has contended that that case decides that any member of the public is a person affected by the judgment of a criminal Court within Section 548. I can only say that if that be the meaning of the decision, I should, with all respect to the learned Judge who decided it, decline to follow it. It seems to me that any such construction would give no meaning at all to the words "affected by a judgment or order", and I am certainly not prepared to hold that those words have no meaning. The application must, therefore, be dismissed.
Nanavati, J.
I agree.