High Courts

In Re: Radhika Mohan Sett

Calcutta High Court · Decided on 11 September 1871 · Citation: (1871) 09 CAL CK 0004

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

1 paragraphs · 66 words

Paul, J.—The applicant is certainly entitled to letters of administration with the will annexed, and I think she is also entitled to probate of the will. This case falls within the principle of in the Goods of Baylis L.R., 1 P. & M., 21. The probate may be granted See also as to the meaning of necessary implication," Crook v. Hill L.R., 6 Ch. App., 315.