AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
4 paragraphs · 87 wordsReilly, J.—I do not agree with the Additional District Magistrate that the provisions of Section 231 of the Code of Criminal Procedure are
inapplicable to cases to which Section 228 applies. u/s 231 of the Code of Criminal Procedure the accused had the right to re-call prosecution
witnesses after the alteration of the charge even if that alteration could not affect his defence, as the Magistrate supposes, and the Magistrate had
no discretion in the matter. The witnesses whom the accused wishes to re-call will be re-called.